General Committee Update – January 23, 2018

Council had a very interesting and very long conversation at General Committee in regards to the implementation of an Interim Control By-Law (ICBL). I put forward this motion to create an ICBL as I felt this was a very straightforward proposal to utilize a tool the Province gives to Municipalities. The province allows municipalities to implement ICBLs for the purpose of putting pauses in place while a study is undertaken in respect of land use policies in the municipality (or a defined part of the municipality). As per Council’s direction, Town staff are currently conducting a study of the Zoning in Stable Neighbourhoods. Thus, I felt that it made sense, in the interim, while that study is being undertaken, that we should institute an ICBL to not allow Minor Variances within stable neighbourhoods. An ICBL would put a temporary hold on requests for changes to our zoning bylaws, and thus prevent the situation where an individual or corporation comes in to ask for more than what is currently allowed within the Town’s zoning. The conversation around the table was very supportive of implementing this common sense approach to managing planning issues in stable neighbourhoods. Council was also supportive of asking that staff speed up the completion of the study, bring it back to Council as soon as possible, so that we could have a fulsome discussion about and make decisions with regards to zoning in our stable neighbourhoods. While Council in the majority was very supportive, Mayor Dawe stated that the issue of development in stable neighbourhoods was “Much ado about nothing” and was not supportive of the motion. I think residents affected by inappropriate development in their neighbourhoods would take issue with Mayor Dawe’s position. Continuing to allow requests for developments that aren’t currently allowed under our existing bylaw is most definitely an issue for our community.

Personally, I am not a fan of the “do nothing” approach. Asking for a temporary pause on such amendment requests while our staff review the issue and make recommendations regarding our zoning by-law only makes sense. Doing nothing while we wait for that report does not make sense, well, to me at least. As I said at the table I expect some developers and builders will be opposed to the Town going down this path, but I am elected to represent the best interests of our residents not the development community. The bylaw won’t stop developments that meet the existing bylaw. But it will put a pause on council considering requests for developments that are not allowed under the current ByLaw.

Will the ICBL prevent a “monster home” that meets our zoning?? No it will not, because it meets the zoning… BUT the ICBL will temporarily stop those development requests that are looking to increase their lot size or height or setbacks beyond what is currently allowed. The ICBL would remain in place until the Staff study comes back to Council for review and approval, sometime in late March/Early April. At the end of the day this is a real problem in our stable neighbourhoods and one that Council needs to address. I believe that the “anything goes” approach to development is hardly in the community’s best interest.

The motion to implement an ICBL was approved 8-1 with Mayor Dawe opposed. I am looking forward to getting that study back so that Council can look at the recommendations from staff regarding our zoning, and move forward with a ByLaw that will better define appropriate development in Aurora and better protect our stable neighbourhoods from inappropriate development. Now that’s Smart Growth!! #GettingThingsDone


Share this post

3 Responses

  1. The rumor around Richardson Drive is that all these smaller, semi-detached homes and perhaps single homes too, will soon be torn down to make room for much larger home development. This is supposed to happen within the next 20 years. How does this fit with your actions to prevent the building of larger, monstrous homes among small homes? The latest large home I’ve seen is on Child Drive. I feel bad for the neighbors who have this towering structure butted up against them. As long as these older homes are still livable, why destroy an entire neighborhood to benefit developers?

    1. Hi Sylvia, That is what the study that staff have undertaken will come back with. Council will be looking at what provisions could be put in place to better protect stable neighbourhoods and make sure that our community grows properly and whithin the character of the neighbourhood. Staff will be holding an informational session to here from residents in these affected areas and what changes they would like to see…. I will let everyone know when this will take place once the date has been finalized.

  2. Thank you, Tom. I’d be interested in hearing what comes from it and would definitely have some questions. The recent destruction of all our forests in the area is devastating not only to the wildlife and their appeal to nature lovers, but they do help clean the air which, as you know, is vital to minimizing smog in a fast-expanding Toronto northward. I hope that will be taken into consideration, too. We need to keep our communities welcoming and healthy for everyone, and that means visually relaxing, which these huge houses contradict.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


If you’d like to keep in touch with the Mayor and receive updates, please add your e-mail.

Recent Posts

Aurora Cares Community Action Team

We held our first meeting of the Aurora Cares Action Team on May 13 where we discussed new ways to connect vulnerable community members to available services, as well as any potential in-kind supports that we may be able to

Read More »

Rotary Clock

This week at committee, Council approved the Rotary Club of Aurora’s proposal to install a Rotary clock at Aurora Town Square (this will need to be ratified at Council). I want to thank the Rotary Club for their generous donation,

Read More »