I am aware that some governments want the Province to fully reimburse municipalities for ASE installation and implementation costs. While this perspective is understandable, it’s important to recognize that ASE was originally designed as a cost-recovery initiative, with revenues intended to offset equipment and operational expenses. It would make sense then that municipalities first use the revenues they’ve collected to offset their program expenses before asking for reimbursement.
Transparency is essential. Municipalities should clearly show how those revenues generated by the ASE program have been allocated, particularly in relation to their intended purpose of road and traffic safety initiatives. If the funds were not spent on these priorities but directed elsewhere, it would be difficult, in my opinion, to justify additional financial support from the Province.
One Response
I have only just seen this comment section. It is horrifying to me that pedestrians and traffic use the roadway at the same time.
Turning right on a red light should be banned (I believe it has been banned in Markham because of the fatalities and injuries but I could be wrong).
It’s crazy that this is allowed. Other countries don’t do this.
I think this must be considered as part of your safety concerns.